This goes hand in hand with how to make money with music, where you are in your music career, and what your music goals are. It’s not ideal to have your budget dictate what you release, but knowing what you need to budget for is good business, and you’ll obviously spend less time - and therefore less money - getting the songs together for an EP. Less time mixing a shorter number of songs means an EP could cost less than half of what you might need for an LP. That might make your decision to release an EP: spend half a day getting your studio sound dialed in and then a day and a half cutting your tracks. Or, let’s say you’re a salsa band and want to cut the ensemble live in a studio and you’ve budgeted for two days of live sound recording. You still may want to go to a professional studio to cut vocals in the A-room and get a professional mix, and when you’re in the recording studio, five songs are going to end up costing you less than 15. Let’s say you’re a five-piece indie rock band with a good home studio set-up that will allow you to record basic tracks and backing vocals. Your budget is more of a factor when it comes to recording, mixing, and mastering your album, and even that is going to change relative to your situation. (If you’re deciding between a Digipak vs. But that’s not always the case, and my bands have released EPs and LPs in Digipaks. Though, the economic CD in jackets is more likely appropriate for an EP release as opposed to an album, so you may save money there. When it comes to your budget, if you’re planning to make CDs - or vinyl records - the cost of production won’t be any different, so from a budget perspective, that’s a zero-sum consideration. It comes down to your musical goals, intentions for the release, who you’re targeting, how this fits with your marketing strategy, and - this is super important - how many songs you have that are worth releasing. This is where things get a little more interesting, and for the most part, one or the other is never wrong. An EP is going to give you more than a bite (single), but it’s lighter fare than a full entrée (LP). To use a food analogy, if an LP is the main course, an EP is an appetizer. Whatever the genre, the length of the program is directly connected to the number of songs, but the gist is an LP is a longer listen than an EP - which is akin to an extended single. If you’re a prog-jazz ensemble, three songs might make an EP, and if you’re a punk/pop band writing two-minute songs, you might go with more. Now, it should go without saying that there’s wiggle room here. You can find varying information online, but I’d argue 4–6 songs is the ideal length for an EP.Īn LP, on the other hand, can range from 8 to 15 songs or more, and you can bring that number up to 30 if you’re releasing a double album. LP album is the number of songs included. The real thing that differentiates an EP vs. What releases you already have in your catalog.What might be a little more complex and worth addressing as you decide what to release include: album (LP) is pretty basic and comes down to two things: album and which might be best for you to release? The two main differences between an extended play vs. Sounds good, but what’s the difference between an EP vs. They represent an artistic statement, a coherent concept, a time capsule of who you are as an artist and person in that place in time in ways a single song cannot capture on its own. The interest sparked by streaming platforms can result in eager new fans seeking longer-play formats like Extended Play records (EP) or Long Play records (LP).Īt their best, EPs and LPs are more than just a collection of disparate songs. While digital distribution and streaming are the predominant means of music discovery and consumption today, these platforms often lead interested listeners in search of something meatier than a single.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |